Readings π
General notes π
Introduction π
Foundations π
Week 36 π
Papers β Capabilities π
- Mitchell, M., 2023. AIβs challenge of understanding the world. Science, 382(6671), eadm8175.
- Mitchell, M., 2024. The metaphors of artificial intelligence. Science, 386(6723), eadt6140.
- Mitchell, M., 2025. Artificial intelligence learns to reason. Science, 387(6740), eadw5211.
Papers with Case Studies (revisited in Session 8 and 9) π
- Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D. and Raymond, L., 2025. Generative AI at Work. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), pp.889β942.
- Agarwal, N., Moehring, A., Rajpurkar, P. and Salz, T., 2023. Combining human expertise with artificial intelligence: Experimental evidence from radiology. NBER Working Paper No. 31422.
- Yu, F. et al., 2024. Heterogeneity and predictors of the effects of AI assistance on radiologists. Nature Medicine, 30(3), pp.837-849.
- Grimon, M-P. and Mills, C., 2025. Better Together? A field experiment on human-algorithm interaction in child protection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08501.
- Argyle, L.P., Busby, E.C., Gubler, J.R., et al., 2025. Testing theories of political persuasion using AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(18), e2412815122.
- Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J. and Mullainathan, S., 2018. Human decisions and machine predictions. The quarterly journal of economics, 133(1), pp.237-293.
Basic and linear machine learning π
- ESL: Chapters 1β4
Inspirational References π
ML to uncover new data sources for social science
- Text data
- Images
- Blumenstock, J., Cadamuro, G. and On, R., 2015. Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata. Science, 350(6264), pp.1073β1076.
- Gebru, T., Krause, J., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Deng, J., Aiden, E.L. and Fei-Fei, L., 2017. Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50), pp.13108β13113.
- Voth, H-J. anf Yanagizawa-Drott, D., 2024. Image(s). Unpublished manuscript
Week 37 π
- Michael A. Nielsen, “Neural Networks and Deep Learning”, Determination Press, 2015
- Available online here
- Chapter 11.1-11.8 in ESLII
- Chapter 9.3 in Causal ML Book
- A Gentle Introduction to torch.autograd
- 11.1-11.3 here
Week 38 π
-
Chapters 3 and 6 from
Speech and Language Processing, 2025 by Jurafsky & Martin, !!! edition from January 2025 !!!
Week 39 π
- Chapter 9 from
Speech and Language Processing, 2025 by Jurafsky & Martin, !!! edition from January 2025 !!! - Vaswani et al. (2017)
Week 40 π
- Chapter: Large Language Models from
Speech and Language Processing, 2025 by Jurafsky & Martin, edition from August 2025 - Chapter: Post-training: Instruction Tuning, Alignment, and Test-Time Compute from
Speech and Language Processing, 2025 by Jurafsky & Martin, edition from August 2025 - Ouyang et al. (2022)
Week 41 π
- Chapters 7.3, 10.4, 10.5, 11.1, 11.3 from Speech and Language Processing, 2025 by Jurafsky & Martin, edition from August 2025
- Chapter 6 “Prompt Engineering” from Hands-on LLMs by Alammar & Grootendorst
- Kojima et al., 2022
- Blog post on Reasoning
- Blog post on Agentic AI
Policy π
Week 43 π
Fairness Definitions & Precision/Recall
- Precision/Recall
- Very brief overview of fairness definitions + 1h video tutorial
- Overview of fairness definitions
- Book on Fairness (optional)
- Mehrabi et al, 2022 (optional)
Case Studies
- Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018
- Cabello et al, 2023 (optional, we won’t discuss this in the lecture)
Theoretical work
- Bell et al., 2023 (revisits the two papers below + 13 min. video)
- Chouldechova, 2017
- Kleinberg et al., 2016
Week 44 and Week 45 π
Case Studies (same as session 1)
Prediction policy formalization
Fairness
- Liang, A., Lu, J., Mu, X. and Okumura, K., 2021. Algorithm Design: A Fairness-Accuracy Frontier. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09975.
- Auerbach, E., et al., 2024. Testing the Fairness-Accuracy Improvability of Algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04816.
- Kasy, M. and Abebe, R., 2021. Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), pp.576β586.
- Arnold, D., Dobbie, W. and Hull, P., 2025. Building Nondiscriminatory Algorithms in Selected Data. American Economic Review: Insights, 7(2), pp.231β249.
Delegation and Learning
- Agarwal, N., Moehring, A. and Wolitzky, A., 2025. Designing Human-AI Collaboration: A Sufficient-Statistic Approach (No. w33949). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Noti, G., Donahue, K., Kleinberg, J. and Oren, S., 2025. Ai-assisted decision making with human learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13062.
Econ ML π
Week 46 π
Basic econometrics
- Angrist and Pischke (2008): chapters 2 and 3
Causal trees and forests
- Athey, S., & Imbens, G. (2016). Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7353-7360.
- Wager, S. and Athey, S., 2018. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), pp.1228-1242.
- Athey, S., Tibshirani, J. and Wager, S., 2019. Generalized random forests. The Annals of Statistics, 47(2), pp.1148-1178.
- Athey, S. and Wager, S., 2019. Estimating treatment effects with causal forests: An application. Observational studies, 5(2), pp.37-51.
Week 47 π
- Vansteelandt, Stijn. βStatistical Modelling in the Age of Data Science.β Observational Studies 7, no. 1 (2021): 217β28.
- Ahrens, Achim, Victor Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen, Damian Kozbur, Mark Schaffer, and Thomas Wiemann. βAn Introduction to Double/Debiased Machine Learning.β arXiv:2504.08324. Preprint, arXiv, April 11, 2025.
- Causal ML Book Chapter 9
For the curious, the original DML paper:
Week 48 π
- Causal ML Book chapter 16
Week 49 π
Identifying human prediction mistakes Rambachan, A. (2024) βIdentifying prediction mistakes in observational dataβ, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 139(3), pp. 1665β1711.
Policy applications of causal ML Knittel, C.R. and Stolper, S. (2025) βUsing machine learning to target treatment: The case of household energy useβ, The Economic Journal, 135(672), pp. 2377β2401. Goller, D., Lechner, M., Pongratz, T. and Wolff, J. (2025) βActive labor market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learningβ, Labour Economics, 94, Article 102729.
Week 50 (outro) π
No readings
Books π
- Angrist, J. D., and Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton university press.